IS SOCIAL WORK A LIAISON ACTIVITY? A PROFESSIONAL DEBATE, OF SORTS

Authors

  • Yvonne M. Johnson Adjunct lecturer, Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY

Abstract

The debate I address is one with which I have struggled since I decided to become a social worker: How is social work to be defined, and what characterizes the social worker's activity and purpose? My thinking related to the nature of social work has its roots in my upbringing In Scotland and my education and social work practice in London and New York. Tracing the development of my ideas might appear self-indulgent. However, understanding this process might enable me to grapple with the history of internal debate and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of my position. Without reference to the development of my thinking over time, my position within the context of the professional debate is not made fully explicit.

 

Copyright of Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping is the property of Cleveland State University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the original abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Downloads

Published

2014-06-25

How to Cite

Johnson, Y. M. (2014). IS SOCIAL WORK A LIAISON ACTIVITY? A PROFESSIONAL DEBATE, OF SORTS. Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping, 3(2), 35–44. Retrieved from https://reflectionsnarrativesofprofessionalhelping.org/index.php/Reflections/article/view/482

Issue

Section

General Submissions